Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch

Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch

Marsoni

M251S

$190.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's WatchSpecification Details Brand Burberry Model BU9704 Barcode Number 822138040235 Gender Women's Case Diameter 38 mm Case Material Stainless Steel Case Colour Rose Gold Dial Colour Rose Check stamped Band Material Leather Band Colour Rose Gold Movement Quartz Chronograph Yes Water Resistance 50 Meters

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Burberry BU9704 Chronograph Rose Dial Rose gold-tone Women's Watch in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Item not as described. The navy version I ordered showed a colored zipper and a print pattern inside the collar in the description but the one I received is solid navy in color. Not what I wanted or ordered. It fit fine and I liked the weight of the material as it is a little heavier than another Maelreg shirt I ordered which had the same description. Be careful when ordering as the color and weight of the material is certainly not accurate.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026